Lassen Sie Ihren Google App Verlauf anzeigen
5 years ago
Monday, March 8, 2010
Monday, February 22, 2010
Friday, January 22, 2010
Che Guevara
Why would any person praise this killer?
Communism, Marxism, and Fascism has killed Millions in the name of their sickness!!! Idiots like my guitar hero Carlos Santana sport his shirt evidently not knowing that Che him self forbid his style of music by penalty of death!!!!
Communism, Marxism, and Fascism has killed Millions in the name of their sickness!!! Idiots like my guitar hero Carlos Santana sport his shirt evidently not knowing that Che him self forbid his style of music by penalty of death!!!!
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Saturday, December 12, 2009
No Longer the Conservative Buddha... After a long study I found this to agree with and wish I could have given birth to it's wisdom...
A libertarian is a person - any person - who consistently advocates individual freedom and consistently opposes the initiation of the use of coercion by anyone upon the person or property of anyone else for any reason. (Coercion is here defined as any action taken by a human being against the will or without the permission of another human being with respect to his or her body or property. This includes murder, rape, kidnaping, assault, trespassing, burglary, robbery, arson and fraud.) Some libertarians (such as the late Robert LeFevre) not only oppose all forms of initiatory coercion, but also the use of retaliatory coercion (revenge or criminal justice). The vast majority of libertarians, however, maintain that physical force used in self-defense or defense of one's family or property is fully justifiable. But, all libertarians, by definition, at least oppose the initiatory use of coercion. They support the rational principle of the individual human rights of life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness. This means that each individual has the right to keep what he earns for himself and his family, and this includes the right to use, trade, sell, give away, or dispose of his property as he sees fit. A person who violates the rights of others by initiating coercion, violence, or fraud against them forfeits his right to be left alone by government and may be arrested, charged, tried, and imprisoned, deported or executed if convicted (depending on the nature of his or her crimes). The basic, proper function of lawful government is therefore limited to protecting these rights of the peaceful individual from criminals and foreign aggression, and in not violating these rights itself, for if government is allowed to go beyond this legitimate function and itself initiates force in violation of the rights of peaceful citizens, it necessarily contradicts the only rational justification for its own existence by acting criminally itself.
Real libertarians take individual rights seriously - seriously enough to consistently uphold them against the initiation of the use of force by anyone (including government) for any reason. This means that government must be bound by the policy of "laissez faire" - which means that government has no business coercively interfering with the lives of peaceful (non-coercive) citizens in their private affairs and voluntary (market) relationships.
Libertarians may or may not approve of some of the things that some people may do in private or in voluntary relations, but whatever their own code of personal moral conduct is, they do not seek to ban any private or voluntary activities by the use of force, including the force of government action. To do so would be to violate the very principle of individual rights of person and property, and thereby undercut any rational argument in favor of freedom or defense of the free-market system. Those exception makers and outright coercive busy-bodies in our midst (referred to as "interventionists" or "statists" by libertarians) who do want to abandon government by principle and instead put Whim in charge of the use of legal coercion are the people who help set the stage for arbitrary and capricious governmental tyranny - leading in the direction of totalitarian dictatorship.
Libertarians Are Not Conservatives
Libertarians are not "conservatives"; libertarians are radicals (principled advocates) for individual freedom and responsibility - and the pure free-market private-enterprise economic system which would result from a consistent application of that principle. A "conservative" on the other hand is one who wishes to preserve the status quo. The status quo in America today is the semi-socialist, semi-fascist mixed-economy welfare-state - a system inimical to personal freedom and responsibility. Libertarians do not support such a system, and oppose any and all measures to expand it while favoring the total repeal of interventionist laws and regulatory agencies.
Conservatives of the William F. Buckley or William Bennett variety are generally more concerned with imposing "order" than with allowing freedom. Although they often (and rightly) complain that government has got "too big" and too meddlesome in our lives, on some specific issues they themselves favor using the political power of government to legislate and enforce their view of morality upon the populace in "the national interest" or for the "social good." William Bennett, for example, opposes the legalization and/or decriminalization of the sale and use of heroin and cocaine, and he continues to support the no-win "War on Drugs" which is causing violence to escalate in our society. Libertarians, on the other hand, realize that "enforced morality" (in such personal matters) is a contradiction in terms; without freedom of choice there can be no moral responsibility and personal growth.
Libertarians also perceive that freedom brings about a more complex, dynamic and harmonious order in society (co-ordinated by the market price mechanism) than any static view of order imposed by central political planning and regulations of our non-coercive behaviors.
Libertarians are for individual freedom - and this includes the freedom of people to do some things that we and other people may disapprove of. A person should be free (from coercive interference) to do what he pleases with his own life and property, as long as he does not violate (through coercive interference) the same right of other peaceful persons to do what they want with their lives and properties. (The second clause is logically implied in the first.) Libertarians do not oppose non-coercive persuasion, educational efforts, private advertising campaigns, organized boycotts, or even social ostracism as means of trying to effect changes in the private behavior of others. (Many people have stopped smoking tobacco in recent years partly as a result of education and persuasion by friends and family members.) What libertarians do oppose is the attempt by anyone (individuals or government officials) to impose their own views of "fairness" or personal morality on others through the initiation of the use of coercion, by either personal violence or political legislation and governmental action. This principled position sets libertarians apart from conservatives as well as other non-libertarians.
Libertarians Are Not Welfare-State "Liberals"
Libertarians are not to be confused with the so-called "civil libertarians" which typify the membership and leadership of the American Civil Liberties Union. It is true that the ACLU has come to the defense of freedom of speech for certain minorities (e.g., nazis, communists, and anarchists) and this is commendable - but the podium has often been at taxpayers' expense, which is a "no-no" from the real libertarian perspective. Many "civil libertarians" believe that some people have a "right" to violate the rights of others; they claim there is a "right to a job" or a "right" to welfare payments or a "right" to "free education" or a "right" to free child care - all at the expense of the people (usually the taxpayers) who are forced to pay for these so-called "rights." Real libertarians are for true freedom, not "freedom" at the forced expense of others. The only obligation that true rights impose on persons is of a negative kind: not to interfere with the rights of other people - i.e., to refrain from the initiation of the use of coercion. This is the core principle of libertarianism and is sometimes called the 'Non-Aggression Axiom'.
Welfare-state "liberals" and "civil libertarians" speak of "rights" of people as members of specially privileged groups, such as "women's rights" or "gay rights" or "rights of the handicapped" or even so-called "animal rights"! Real libertarians know that there are only individual rights, not group rights. There is no such thing as "gay rights" or "black rights" or "white rights" or left-handed Martian rights. Government must not be used to dish out special privileges to any group for any reason, since government cannot give anyone anything unless it takes it away from others by force, thereby violating their rights. There can be no such thing as a "right" to violate the rights of others.
No doubt there are some well-intentioned ACLU members who do promote true civil liberties and uphold human rights; however, the ACLU has not come to the defense of the rights of school children whose freedom is being violated daily by compulsory attendance laws and the tyranny of Federally-ordered forced busing. Nor do I know of any case in which the ACLU has defended the constitutional rights of businessmen who are being harassed by OSHA agents and other bureaucrats, or hounded by such arbitrary and subjective laws as the antitrust acts. Indeed, many "civil libertarians" seem callously insensitive to the victims of crime and legal plunder - while they defend known criminals from justice.
Because of their consistent adherence to the principle of individual rights, libertarians are the only true defenders of liberty -- civil or otherwise. Real libertarians understand that freedom of speech and other civil liberties depend on the sanctity of private property - not its violation by anti-discrimination laws and other forms of government intervention.
Libertarians Are Not for Unlimited Majority Rule
Libertarians are not democrats. While majority rule may or may not be as good as any other mechanism for selecting the men and women who administer the offices of government, libertarians deny that anyone or any group has a right to rule over other peaceful (non-coercive) citizens - whether they are in the majority or minority at any given time. If stealing is wrong for an individual to do, it is still wrong when conducted by a large group or by a majority vote. The number of people involved in an act does not change the rightness or wrongness of the act. There is no magic number that turns an individual wrong into a collective right. In a libertarian republic, the basic policy of government (i.e., laissez faire) is set by reference to fundamental principle -- the principle of individual rights -- and not determined by a show of hands. Libertarians uphold the right of the peaceful individual to self-ownership and private property against any who would violate this right - even a majority.
Libertarians Are Not Anarchists
Libertarians are not anarchists. While it is true that some individuals favor a political system of competing vigilante committees, and refer to this position as "anarcho-capitalism" (a view formerly held by libertarian economist Murray Rothbard), this is a confusing misnomer based on an apparent failure to clearly distinguish between the nature of market institutions (which do not involve the use of coercion at all, either initiatory or retaliatory) and the nature of coercive entities (criminal or legal). Actually, libertarianism rests on the concepts of individualism, self-ownership, private property, & voluntary (market) exchange. Classical anarchism not only opposed the political state, but also some voluntary organizations of which it disapproved. Most importantly, true anarchists opposed private property - without which no voluntary relationships are possible. Today's libertarians are in the classical liberal tradition of Algernon Sidney, John Locke, Adam Smith, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Edmund Burke, Herbert Spencer, and Frederic Bastiat - not the anarchist tradition of Proudhon, Kropotkin, and Bakunin.
Libertarians Are Not Pragmatists
Libertarians do not advocate freedom or the free-market economy merely because "it works" (which it does better than any other system); they support it as the only non-coercive and just system - the system in which people are free to deal with one another on a voluntary basis as traders (exchangers of goods and services) instead of as masters and slaves - or as privileged class and exploited host. Others advocate government by whim. Libertarians adhere to certain principles, and without the guidance of principles and standards, all that is left is pragmatic expediency and the tyranny of government by whim. One might say that libertarians are "idealists" in the popular sense of that word; after all, libertarians stand for certain ideals - goals to strive for (e.g., less government intervention, more individual freedom and moral responsibility, free markets, etc.). Because libertarianism is based on man's nature and the nature of reality, it is the most practicable social system. Libertarians are practical idealists.
Real libertarians take individual rights seriously - seriously enough to consistently uphold them against the initiation of the use of force by anyone (including government) for any reason. This means that government must be bound by the policy of "laissez faire" - which means that government has no business coercively interfering with the lives of peaceful (non-coercive) citizens in their private affairs and voluntary (market) relationships.
Libertarians may or may not approve of some of the things that some people may do in private or in voluntary relations, but whatever their own code of personal moral conduct is, they do not seek to ban any private or voluntary activities by the use of force, including the force of government action. To do so would be to violate the very principle of individual rights of person and property, and thereby undercut any rational argument in favor of freedom or defense of the free-market system. Those exception makers and outright coercive busy-bodies in our midst (referred to as "interventionists" or "statists" by libertarians) who do want to abandon government by principle and instead put Whim in charge of the use of legal coercion are the people who help set the stage for arbitrary and capricious governmental tyranny - leading in the direction of totalitarian dictatorship.
Libertarians Are Not Conservatives
Libertarians are not "conservatives"; libertarians are radicals (principled advocates) for individual freedom and responsibility - and the pure free-market private-enterprise economic system which would result from a consistent application of that principle. A "conservative" on the other hand is one who wishes to preserve the status quo. The status quo in America today is the semi-socialist, semi-fascist mixed-economy welfare-state - a system inimical to personal freedom and responsibility. Libertarians do not support such a system, and oppose any and all measures to expand it while favoring the total repeal of interventionist laws and regulatory agencies.
Conservatives of the William F. Buckley or William Bennett variety are generally more concerned with imposing "order" than with allowing freedom. Although they often (and rightly) complain that government has got "too big" and too meddlesome in our lives, on some specific issues they themselves favor using the political power of government to legislate and enforce their view of morality upon the populace in "the national interest" or for the "social good." William Bennett, for example, opposes the legalization and/or decriminalization of the sale and use of heroin and cocaine, and he continues to support the no-win "War on Drugs" which is causing violence to escalate in our society. Libertarians, on the other hand, realize that "enforced morality" (in such personal matters) is a contradiction in terms; without freedom of choice there can be no moral responsibility and personal growth.
Libertarians also perceive that freedom brings about a more complex, dynamic and harmonious order in society (co-ordinated by the market price mechanism) than any static view of order imposed by central political planning and regulations of our non-coercive behaviors.
Libertarians are for individual freedom - and this includes the freedom of people to do some things that we and other people may disapprove of. A person should be free (from coercive interference) to do what he pleases with his own life and property, as long as he does not violate (through coercive interference) the same right of other peaceful persons to do what they want with their lives and properties. (The second clause is logically implied in the first.) Libertarians do not oppose non-coercive persuasion, educational efforts, private advertising campaigns, organized boycotts, or even social ostracism as means of trying to effect changes in the private behavior of others. (Many people have stopped smoking tobacco in recent years partly as a result of education and persuasion by friends and family members.) What libertarians do oppose is the attempt by anyone (individuals or government officials) to impose their own views of "fairness" or personal morality on others through the initiation of the use of coercion, by either personal violence or political legislation and governmental action. This principled position sets libertarians apart from conservatives as well as other non-libertarians.
Libertarians Are Not Welfare-State "Liberals"
Libertarians are not to be confused with the so-called "civil libertarians" which typify the membership and leadership of the American Civil Liberties Union. It is true that the ACLU has come to the defense of freedom of speech for certain minorities (e.g., nazis, communists, and anarchists) and this is commendable - but the podium has often been at taxpayers' expense, which is a "no-no" from the real libertarian perspective. Many "civil libertarians" believe that some people have a "right" to violate the rights of others; they claim there is a "right to a job" or a "right" to welfare payments or a "right" to "free education" or a "right" to free child care - all at the expense of the people (usually the taxpayers) who are forced to pay for these so-called "rights." Real libertarians are for true freedom, not "freedom" at the forced expense of others. The only obligation that true rights impose on persons is of a negative kind: not to interfere with the rights of other people - i.e., to refrain from the initiation of the use of coercion. This is the core principle of libertarianism and is sometimes called the 'Non-Aggression Axiom'.
Welfare-state "liberals" and "civil libertarians" speak of "rights" of people as members of specially privileged groups, such as "women's rights" or "gay rights" or "rights of the handicapped" or even so-called "animal rights"! Real libertarians know that there are only individual rights, not group rights. There is no such thing as "gay rights" or "black rights" or "white rights" or left-handed Martian rights. Government must not be used to dish out special privileges to any group for any reason, since government cannot give anyone anything unless it takes it away from others by force, thereby violating their rights. There can be no such thing as a "right" to violate the rights of others.
No doubt there are some well-intentioned ACLU members who do promote true civil liberties and uphold human rights; however, the ACLU has not come to the defense of the rights of school children whose freedom is being violated daily by compulsory attendance laws and the tyranny of Federally-ordered forced busing. Nor do I know of any case in which the ACLU has defended the constitutional rights of businessmen who are being harassed by OSHA agents and other bureaucrats, or hounded by such arbitrary and subjective laws as the antitrust acts. Indeed, many "civil libertarians" seem callously insensitive to the victims of crime and legal plunder - while they defend known criminals from justice.
Because of their consistent adherence to the principle of individual rights, libertarians are the only true defenders of liberty -- civil or otherwise. Real libertarians understand that freedom of speech and other civil liberties depend on the sanctity of private property - not its violation by anti-discrimination laws and other forms of government intervention.
Libertarians Are Not for Unlimited Majority Rule
Libertarians are not democrats. While majority rule may or may not be as good as any other mechanism for selecting the men and women who administer the offices of government, libertarians deny that anyone or any group has a right to rule over other peaceful (non-coercive) citizens - whether they are in the majority or minority at any given time. If stealing is wrong for an individual to do, it is still wrong when conducted by a large group or by a majority vote. The number of people involved in an act does not change the rightness or wrongness of the act. There is no magic number that turns an individual wrong into a collective right. In a libertarian republic, the basic policy of government (i.e., laissez faire) is set by reference to fundamental principle -- the principle of individual rights -- and not determined by a show of hands. Libertarians uphold the right of the peaceful individual to self-ownership and private property against any who would violate this right - even a majority.
Libertarians Are Not Anarchists
Libertarians are not anarchists. While it is true that some individuals favor a political system of competing vigilante committees, and refer to this position as "anarcho-capitalism" (a view formerly held by libertarian economist Murray Rothbard), this is a confusing misnomer based on an apparent failure to clearly distinguish between the nature of market institutions (which do not involve the use of coercion at all, either initiatory or retaliatory) and the nature of coercive entities (criminal or legal). Actually, libertarianism rests on the concepts of individualism, self-ownership, private property, & voluntary (market) exchange. Classical anarchism not only opposed the political state, but also some voluntary organizations of which it disapproved. Most importantly, true anarchists opposed private property - without which no voluntary relationships are possible. Today's libertarians are in the classical liberal tradition of Algernon Sidney, John Locke, Adam Smith, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Edmund Burke, Herbert Spencer, and Frederic Bastiat - not the anarchist tradition of Proudhon, Kropotkin, and Bakunin.
Libertarians Are Not Pragmatists
Libertarians do not advocate freedom or the free-market economy merely because "it works" (which it does better than any other system); they support it as the only non-coercive and just system - the system in which people are free to deal with one another on a voluntary basis as traders (exchangers of goods and services) instead of as masters and slaves - or as privileged class and exploited host. Others advocate government by whim. Libertarians adhere to certain principles, and without the guidance of principles and standards, all that is left is pragmatic expediency and the tyranny of government by whim. One might say that libertarians are "idealists" in the popular sense of that word; after all, libertarians stand for certain ideals - goals to strive for (e.g., less government intervention, more individual freedom and moral responsibility, free markets, etc.). Because libertarianism is based on man's nature and the nature of reality, it is the most practicable social system. Libertarians are practical idealists.
Barack Hussein Obama II... He's no Lama
Main Entry: fas·cism
Pronunciation: \ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm also ˈfa-ˌsi-\
Function: noun
Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces
Date: 1921
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
Main Entry: so·cial·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1837
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
Main Entry: com·mu·nism
Pronunciation: \ˈkäm-yə-ˌni-zəm, -yü-\
Function: noun
Etymology: French communisme, from commun common
Date: 1840
1 a : a theory advocating elimination of private property b : a system in which goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed
2 capitalized a : a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics b : a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production c : a final stage of society in Marxist theory in which the state has withered away and economic goods are distributed equitably d : communist systems collectively
Friday, December 11, 2009
Al Gore’s Poem of Apocalypse
Having only posted one article on my blog since it's inception this truly could be my last. Why? Many years ago a wise person told me that you should pick your fights wisely as you can never win one against the crazy. OK so, I was really thinking about sitting down and applying myself and writing an article that might rival my peers in the Bogging community... not through any competitive nature but as a responsibility to the coalition of apathy fighters whom I owe a sincere thanks to for there diligent and resilient fight for right... and then I saw this... Al Gore's Poem of Apocalypse.... CRAZY!!!!
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
NO LIVING AMERICAN HAS EVER BEEN A SLAVE!!!
NO LIVING AMERICAN HAS EVER BEEN A SLAVE!!!
TODAY THEY ARE ALL FROGS SLOWLY BEING BOILED INTO SLAVERY LIKE THEIR ANCESTORS’ ENSLAVEMENT BY THE ABSOLUTE RULE OF KINGS.
Those Kings’ power influenced all of mankind until AMERICA was born and defied their absolute rule by creating a land of FREE MEN!!! The excruciating birth took almost two hundred years with both valiant and unscrupulous midwives attending the protracted event. The valiant had a vision of bringing forth a FREE CHILD while the unscrupulous, who had never separated their own umbilical cord connection to the Kings’ power, tried with all their might to defeat the ideas of the valiant.
The valiant winner went on to produce the highest standard of living in the history of mankind once they freed the slaves and made men Kings over their own domains.
No longer were naives and indigent servants from the oppressed European population
required to coward to arbitrary rule nor did the forced black slavery continue as a justifiable, acceptable way of doing business.
The good life these descendants of naives, indigent servants and African slaves eventually experienced dulled their memory of oppression. For them there was never any other way of life.
In order to grandly enslave all mankind again for their own enrichment and power, the unscrupulous insidiously turned up the fire to weaken personal power and reverse the freedom all Americans took for granted.
DO YOU WISH TO BE A SLAVE AGAIN??
WAKE UP ALL YOU AMERICAN FROGS!!!!!
JUMP OUT OF THE BOILING POT BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!!!!
HOW?
READ EVERYTHING… MARX, ENGELS, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, AND LIBERALISM THINKERS AND DECIDE IF YOU WANT THEM TO THINK FOR YOU.
READ THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE STRUGGLE TO BRING IT INTO FRUITION - THE RESULT THAT YOU ARE LIVING TODAY BECAUSE OF ITS VALITITY. IT HAS WORKED BETTER THAN ANY OTHER SYSTEM THAT HAS EVER BEEN CREATED BY CIVILIZED MAN.
WHY WOULD ANY MAN WISH TO CHANGE IT? POWER OVER YOUR FREEDOM TO THINK AND HOW TO SURVIVE!!!!
IT IS A BARBARIC THROW BACK TO FORCED SELECTION AS TO WHO WILL AND WHO WILL NOT SURVIVE …. ABSOLUTE RULE BY A FEW!!!
FIND AND SUPPORT A VALIANT CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR PUBLIC OFFICE WILLING TO BATTLE THE STATUS QUO, THE UNSCRUPULOUS AND THE INSIDIOUS TACTICS OF THOSE WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO GAIN POWER OVER OUR AMERICAN FREEDOM.
KEEP ON FILE HOW TO BE IN TOUCH WITH YOUR REPRESNTATIVES.
MONITOR ALL POLITICIANS FOR INTEGRITY TO THEIR PLEDGES.
MAKE YOUR OWN PLEDGE TO VOTE IN ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FERDERAL ELECTIONS AFTER MAKING YOURSELVES AWARE OF WHAT YOU ARE VOTING FOR OR AGAINST…SLAVERY OR FREEDOM!!!!!!
NO MORE APATHY… NO MORE TRUSTING THAT THE “POWERS” ARE LOOKING OUT FOR YOUR OR AMERICA’S BEST INTERESTS.
BE ON GUARD THROUGH MONITORING ALL SOURCES OF YOUR INFORMATION TO DISCOVER CONTRADICTIONS OF INFORMATION BEING BROADCASTED BY ANY MEDIA.
BE AS AGGRESSIVE AS THE WOULD-BE-OPPRESSORS ARE BY USING THE POWERS OF COMMUNICATION… THE INTERNET, LETTERS, MEETINGS, AND PERSONAL ENGAGEMENTS TO ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOW CITIZENS WHO ARE IN THE BOILING WATER BUT DON’T KNOW IT!!! LETTERS TO THE EDITORS WILL NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY FOR IT IS A FOREGONE CONCLUSION THAT THE WATER IS TOO HOT FOR THEM. THEY ARE COERCED TO BOW TO THE PREVAILING POWER MISINFORMATION OR DESIGNED PROPOGADA…OR ELSE THEY HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED IN ANOTHER BATH OF THE RULING CLASS INCLUSION FRATERNITY.
GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH FROM THE RULE OF THESE IDIOTS WHOSE ONLY CRAVING IS POWER AND RICHES AT OUR EXPENSE OF LABOR AND CREATIVITY.
Barbara Hanson, an American female who has never doubted my personal sovereignty since I was born, by great fortune, in the United States of America in 1934. I worked diligently against prejudices of the time by persevering in my chosen professional field and earning respect and acceptance by doing so - with no advantages of government interventions to force my ability to compete.
I am forever grateful to the VALIANT men who gave birth to FREEDOM and to all the free thinkers that made the United States of America.
NOT “LONG LIVE THE QUEEN”….LONG LIVE FREE MEN!!!!
TODAY THEY ARE ALL FROGS SLOWLY BEING BOILED INTO SLAVERY LIKE THEIR ANCESTORS’ ENSLAVEMENT BY THE ABSOLUTE RULE OF KINGS.
Those Kings’ power influenced all of mankind until AMERICA was born and defied their absolute rule by creating a land of FREE MEN!!! The excruciating birth took almost two hundred years with both valiant and unscrupulous midwives attending the protracted event. The valiant had a vision of bringing forth a FREE CHILD while the unscrupulous, who had never separated their own umbilical cord connection to the Kings’ power, tried with all their might to defeat the ideas of the valiant.
The valiant winner went on to produce the highest standard of living in the history of mankind once they freed the slaves and made men Kings over their own domains.
No longer were naives and indigent servants from the oppressed European population
required to coward to arbitrary rule nor did the forced black slavery continue as a justifiable, acceptable way of doing business.
The good life these descendants of naives, indigent servants and African slaves eventually experienced dulled their memory of oppression. For them there was never any other way of life.
In order to grandly enslave all mankind again for their own enrichment and power, the unscrupulous insidiously turned up the fire to weaken personal power and reverse the freedom all Americans took for granted.
DO YOU WISH TO BE A SLAVE AGAIN??
WAKE UP ALL YOU AMERICAN FROGS!!!!!
JUMP OUT OF THE BOILING POT BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!!!!
HOW?
READ EVERYTHING… MARX, ENGELS, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, AND LIBERALISM THINKERS AND DECIDE IF YOU WANT THEM TO THINK FOR YOU.
READ THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE STRUGGLE TO BRING IT INTO FRUITION - THE RESULT THAT YOU ARE LIVING TODAY BECAUSE OF ITS VALITITY. IT HAS WORKED BETTER THAN ANY OTHER SYSTEM THAT HAS EVER BEEN CREATED BY CIVILIZED MAN.
WHY WOULD ANY MAN WISH TO CHANGE IT? POWER OVER YOUR FREEDOM TO THINK AND HOW TO SURVIVE!!!!
IT IS A BARBARIC THROW BACK TO FORCED SELECTION AS TO WHO WILL AND WHO WILL NOT SURVIVE …. ABSOLUTE RULE BY A FEW!!!
FIND AND SUPPORT A VALIANT CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR PUBLIC OFFICE WILLING TO BATTLE THE STATUS QUO, THE UNSCRUPULOUS AND THE INSIDIOUS TACTICS OF THOSE WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO GAIN POWER OVER OUR AMERICAN FREEDOM.
KEEP ON FILE HOW TO BE IN TOUCH WITH YOUR REPRESNTATIVES.
MONITOR ALL POLITICIANS FOR INTEGRITY TO THEIR PLEDGES.
MAKE YOUR OWN PLEDGE TO VOTE IN ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FERDERAL ELECTIONS AFTER MAKING YOURSELVES AWARE OF WHAT YOU ARE VOTING FOR OR AGAINST…SLAVERY OR FREEDOM!!!!!!
NO MORE APATHY… NO MORE TRUSTING THAT THE “POWERS” ARE LOOKING OUT FOR YOUR OR AMERICA’S BEST INTERESTS.
BE ON GUARD THROUGH MONITORING ALL SOURCES OF YOUR INFORMATION TO DISCOVER CONTRADICTIONS OF INFORMATION BEING BROADCASTED BY ANY MEDIA.
BE AS AGGRESSIVE AS THE WOULD-BE-OPPRESSORS ARE BY USING THE POWERS OF COMMUNICATION… THE INTERNET, LETTERS, MEETINGS, AND PERSONAL ENGAGEMENTS TO ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOW CITIZENS WHO ARE IN THE BOILING WATER BUT DON’T KNOW IT!!! LETTERS TO THE EDITORS WILL NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY FOR IT IS A FOREGONE CONCLUSION THAT THE WATER IS TOO HOT FOR THEM. THEY ARE COERCED TO BOW TO THE PREVAILING POWER MISINFORMATION OR DESIGNED PROPOGADA…OR ELSE THEY HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED IN ANOTHER BATH OF THE RULING CLASS INCLUSION FRATERNITY.
GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH FROM THE RULE OF THESE IDIOTS WHOSE ONLY CRAVING IS POWER AND RICHES AT OUR EXPENSE OF LABOR AND CREATIVITY.
Barbara Hanson, an American female who has never doubted my personal sovereignty since I was born, by great fortune, in the United States of America in 1934. I worked diligently against prejudices of the time by persevering in my chosen professional field and earning respect and acceptance by doing so - with no advantages of government interventions to force my ability to compete.
I am forever grateful to the VALIANT men who gave birth to FREEDOM and to all the free thinkers that made the United States of America.
NOT “LONG LIVE THE QUEEN”….LONG LIVE FREE MEN!!!!
Monday, December 7, 2009
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
EMP!!!
EMP is shorthand for Electro Magnetic Pulse. It is a rather unusual and frightening by-product when a nuclear bomb is detonated above the earth’s atmosphere. We all know that our atmosphere and the magnetic field which surrounds our planet is a thin layer which not only keeps us alive, but also protects us from dangerous radiation from the sun. On a fairly regular basis there are huge solar storms on the sun’s surface which emit powerful jets of deadly radiation. If not for the protective layer of our atmosphere and magnetic field, those storms would fry us. At times though, the storm is so power that enough disruptive energy reaches the earth’s surface that it drowns out radio waves and even shorts electrical power grids. . .this happened seve ral years back in Canada. http://www.onesecondafter.com/
Monday, November 23, 2009
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Sunday, November 8, 2009
The Gadsden Flag...
Hello South East Texas... glad you made it to the CB.
This being my first post I'll make it sweet and short.
Nov 7th a friend and I made it to Rodgers Park under
the Autumn blue sky of poet dreams, people slowly
gathering in front of an old baseball backstop from
my youth... a monument at the far side of this
old Beaumont gathering spot.
Having grown up here I was feeling nostalgic, and coming
to my first Tea Party for the SETX chapter made it also
something to take pride in. The crowd gathering was from
all walks of life, young and old the like. Not to my surprise
these were the type of people I meet when out fishing... friendly
compassionate and who have never met a stranger. The event
went on without a hitch except maybe only that we ran out of
day, book-marked with a photographer's dream sunset. The
image most burnt into my mind.s eye is the one below. Our
next generation under the Gadsden Flag smiling with faith
that all we have perservered for will still be here when
she becomes a woman. Thanks to all that attended.
Click on the picture below for a slide show
of this wonderfull coalition.
This being my first post I'll make it sweet and short.
Nov 7th a friend and I made it to Rodgers Park under
the Autumn blue sky of poet dreams, people slowly
gathering in front of an old baseball backstop from
my youth... a monument at the far side of this
old Beaumont gathering spot.
Having grown up here I was feeling nostalgic, and coming
to my first Tea Party for the SETX chapter made it also
something to take pride in. The crowd gathering was from
all walks of life, young and old the like. Not to my surprise
these were the type of people I meet when out fishing... friendly
compassionate and who have never met a stranger. The event
went on without a hitch except maybe only that we ran out of
day, book-marked with a photographer's dream sunset. The
image most burnt into my mind.s eye is the one below. Our
next generation under the Gadsden Flag smiling with faith
that all we have perservered for will still be here when
she becomes a woman. Thanks to all that attended.
Click on the picture below for a slide show
of this wonderfull coalition.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
